Skip to main content

Building Effective Teams Using Strengths



Purpose
The purpose of this project is for students to:
·       gain an understanding of their Gallup Top 5 Strengths, and increase awareness for how the students use them in their everyday lives, and
·       increase understanding on using Gallup Strengths for building effective teams.

Target Audience
This project will target the social aspect of Millenials, who are “open about themselves, their opinions, and their emotions” (West & West, 2009, p. 25). It will also target working adults and nontraditional students, who will be able to bring in experiences they have had and the knowledge they have learned about themselves, which appeals to their desire to be “respected for what they already know and for the experiences they have already undergone” (West & West, 2009, p. 26).

Learning Objectives
1.       Increase understanding of Individual Strengths
2.       Increase understanding of how Individual Strengths are used in everyday life
3.       Increase understanding of diversity of others’ Strengths by learning about the Strengths of group members
4.       Increased understanding of how to increase team effectiveness using StrengthsFinder Team Grid

Rationale
Wikis are useful tools for learning because they “provide the tools and collaborative work space that enable contextual teaching and learning (West & West, 2009, p. 22). Wikis are particularly useful for critical thinking, where students can “organize ideas, conduct critical reviews, engage group members though comments and questions, and come to a consensus regarding final outcomes” (West & West, 2009, p. 80).
 “What if…?” scenarios can be designed to support collaborative critical thinking (West & West, 2009). Group members can brainstorm ideas, decide on appropriate scenarios and rationales, and then share them publicly on the wiki site. Others can then view the information and ask questions for the group members to respond to, furthering the critical thinking process.
It is necessary to create an atmosphere of trust among members of the group for effective collaboration (West & West, 2009). West & West (2009) suggest icebreakers for this purpose, however, the group members will be sharing personal information as part of their project so no additional icebreaker will be used in this course.

Wiki Use
Class members will be put into groups of 3-4 individuals. Each group will create their own wiki. The purpose of the wiki is to share their individual Strengths, and then complete a “what if…?” scenario:
You and the others in your group work for the same organization. You have been put in the same group to work on a big project together. The stakes are high for this project, so your boss has promised a bonus if you can meet the timeline and stay under budget. How will you work effectively as a team to be successful? Specifically, how can you improve team dynamics and team collaboration? Who (if anyone) would you add to the group (if anyone) and why?

Lesson Plan
Week
Method
Assignment
Week 1
Discussion Post
Take StrengthsFinder assessment and identify your Top 5 Strengths. Report Strengths in discussion post.
Week 2
Discussion Post
Answer the following questions based on your Top 5 Strengths:
·       Which Strength do you most identify with?
·       Where you surprised by any of the Strengths that appeared in your Top 5, or did not appear in your Top 5?
·       Which of your Top 5 Strengths do you want to learn more about and why?
Week 3
Discussion post
Students select one of their Top 5 Strengths to learn about how they use it in everyday life. Students create and maintain a log for one week tracking when they noticed they were using their Strength, and the result. Students share two examples
Week 4
Discussion post
Teacher assigns groups and distributes wiki pages. Students place Top 5 Strengths on wiki page. In Discussion post students respond to team members’ Strengths. What similarities and/or differences do you find?
Week 5
Discussion post, Wiki
Students are given Team Grid and add their Strengths to Team Grid, then add Team Grid to Wiki. In Discussion post students respond to Team Grid. What gaps exist in the Four Domains (Executing, Influencing, Strategic Thinking, Relationship Building)? What overlaps exist?
Week 6

Students are given “what if…?” scenario. Students are to work collaboratively to answer the questions.
Week 7
Wiki
Students post “what if…?” scenario on wiki, along with questions and answers.
Week 8
Wiki
Students view other group wikis and respond to at least two other groups.

Evaluation
Desired outcomes are:
·       Increased understanding of personal Strengths
·       Increased awareness of how Strengths are used in everyday life
·       Increased understanding of diversity of others’ Strengths
·       Increased understanding of how to increase team effectiveness using StrengthsFinder Team Grid

Students are evaluated based on the following rubric:
Outcome
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Score
Increased understanding of personal Strengths

Strengths listed with detailed examples and reflection on all 5 Strengths  
Strengths listed, few examples and reflection
Strengths listed but no examples or reflection
No post
/15
Increased awareness of how Strengths are used in everyday life
Complete log (7 days) with detailed information about situations where Strength was used
Complete log (7 days) with some details about situations where Strength was used
Incomplete log (less than 7 days) with few details about situations where Strength was used
Incomplete log (less than 7 days), no situations described
/15
Increased understanding of diversity of others’ Strengths by learning about the Strengths of group members

Detailed comments on all other group members’ posts with reflection and examples of their strengths.
Comments on at least one group members’ post with reflection and/or example
Comments on at least one group members’ post
No comments
/15
Increased understanding of how to increase team effectiveness using StrengthsFinder Team Grid

Questions answered in detail using Team Grid
Questions answered using Team Grid
Incomplete or unclear answers to questions or not all questions answered
No use of Team Grid
/30
Total Score




/75

References
Clifton, D. (2017). Discover your CliftonStrengths. Gallup Press: New York.
West, J.A. and West, M.L. (2009). Using Wikis for Online Collaboration. Joss

Comments

  1. Top 5 Clifton Strengths is a very popular topic in leadership development so I can see the real-world application of your 8-week course/training!

    In your rationale, it was not made clear whether your use of wiki was for the purpose of supporting collaborative learning, knowledge construction, critical thinking, and/or contextual application. Because "what if..." was included as a key component of your wiki project, I would assume your main purpose of the use of wiki was more for critical thinking development than contextual application. Would you agree?

    Kang

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! I used the "what if...?" scenario as a way to use the wiki for critical thinking. I initially struggled a bit because I could see this topic fitting into any of the three domains (knowledge construction, critical thinking, and contextual application) identified by West & West (2009), but I chose the "what if...?" scenario to promote the students to think critically about their team Strengths and identify their own strategies for using them effectively.

      Delete
  2. Wow! I love this idea. You mentioned a Team Grid - is that something Strengthsfinder provides or does the instructor create this? I love the idea of the "what if" scenario - provides guidance but still gives them the freedom to come up with their own plan.

    My only concern would be if a student did not feel comfortable sharing their personal strengths for some reason, how could they still be included? Perhaps instead of having each group use their own strengths, they could each be assigned a strength to use for their "what if" scenario.

    I really like your lesson plan and the way you laid it out for us!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Anaka! There is an actual Team Grid that Gallup provides. If you are interested I can send you the spreadsheet! I really like your idea about letting students choose an alternative Strength if they did not feel comfortable sharing their own.

      Delete
    2. alikat217,
      That would be wonderful, thank you! I am always looking for new team building activities for my team at work. :)
      Anaka

      Delete
  3. I really liked you idea as well. Perhaps as part of the "what if" scenario, the groups could analyze/predict what challenges they may face (based on their collective strengths) and brainstorm possible solutions. I liked the idea of asking them who (if anyone) they should look to add to the group to make it stronger. I think a lot of teams could benefit from this type of activity. I'm even thinking of my own office - we're about to hire a new person. This sort of activity might be useful for my supervisor to get a good idea of what type of traits to look for in a potential new employee. Lots of practical applications - great job!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gallup's Top 5 strengths is awesome, so I enjoyed reading through this. I really like the rubric that you put together for this and what it emphasizes. I also like how you clearly outlined the desired outcomes. The timeline for the 8 weeks is ideal as well, taking the first few weeks to utilize a discussion board and get on the same page before starting the wiki. Great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wikis: Pros and Cons for Adult Learners

Wikis: Pros and Cons for Adult Learners Wikis are online platforms designed "to help groups collaborate, share, and build online content" (West & West, 2009). Wikis are meant to be a space where people can work asynchronously together on a common project. Wikis provide opportunities for team members working on a group project to each contribute to the design. Wikis are accessible by multiple people and anyone can contribute, edit, or remove content. (West & West, 2009). This is different from a blog where typically one person controls the content. Unlike discussion threads, the text in Wikis is not linked or linear, and can appear in varying formats on the wiki page (West & West, 2009). This can allow for more creativity and expression, but less structure if an instructor was wanting a particular template constructed for the Wiki. Warlick (as quoted in King and Cox, 2011), provided three advantages for working with Wikis: 1. Practical for ...

Blogging as a Learning Tool

Blogging as a Learning Tool According to the assigned readings for the week, blogging is a useful tool to facilitate learning. Kuo, et al. (2017) cite 4 reasons for this:  1. Students are actively participating and collaborating 2. Students are interacting and supporting each other 3. Students' motivation to learn is increased 4. Students develop critical thinking and reflective skills.  MacPhail (2019) and Witte (2007) both described examples of blogs as effective learning based on student engagement levels. In MacPhail's (2019) article she described how her students engaged "more closely with class materials" and thought "more deeply" about the subject (p. 3).  Witte (2007) described how her students were more engaged when writing for a blog than paper writing assignments. Her study paired preservice college teachers with middle school students and found that collaboration, participation, and supportive feedback were common when...

Audio/Video Podcasts: Pros and Cons for Adult Learners

Podcasts are digital audio files that can be used to facilitate learning. Videos provide the visual component to accompany the audio information.Both forms of technology can be useful for instructors to facilitate instruction and/or creating engaging student assignments using the technology. Following are some pros and cons to consider when including technology for either of these purposes: Pros: Portable and can be globally shared, meaning we can "cultivate the means to building and sustaining global scholarship communities" (King & Cox, 2011, p. 34).  Technology is simple and inexpensive Ability to build assignments that "generate deeper research, analysis, and knowledge construction" (King & Cox, 2011, p. 34) Connect creativity to content Instructors can record lectures and turn them into podcasts or videos so students who had to miss the lecture can still have an opportunity to hear it Instructors can slice lectures into smaller sections that ...