Purpose
The purpose of this project is for students to:
·
gain an understanding of their Gallup Top 5
Strengths, and increase awareness for how the students use them in their
everyday lives, and
·
increase understanding on using Gallup Strengths
for building effective teams.
Target Audience
This project will target the social aspect of Millenials,
who are “open about themselves, their opinions, and their emotions” (West &
West, 2009, p. 25). It will also target working adults and nontraditional
students, who will be able to bring in experiences they have had and the
knowledge they have learned about themselves, which appeals to their desire to
be “respected for what they already know and for the experiences they have
already undergone” (West & West, 2009, p. 26).
Learning Objectives
1.
Increase understanding of Individual Strengths
2.
Increase understanding of how Individual
Strengths are used in everyday life
3.
Increase understanding of diversity of others’
Strengths by learning about the Strengths of group members
4.
Increased understanding of how to increase team
effectiveness using StrengthsFinder Team Grid
Rationale
Wikis are useful tools for learning because they “provide
the tools and collaborative work space that enable contextual teaching and
learning (West & West, 2009, p. 22). Wikis are particularly useful for critical
thinking, where students can “organize ideas, conduct critical reviews, engage
group members though comments and questions, and come to a consensus regarding
final outcomes” (West & West, 2009, p. 80).
“What if…?” scenarios
can be designed to support collaborative critical thinking (West & West,
2009). Group members can brainstorm ideas, decide on appropriate scenarios and
rationales, and then share them publicly on the wiki site. Others can then view
the information and ask questions for the group members to respond to, furthering
the critical thinking process.
It is necessary to create an atmosphere of trust among
members of the group for effective collaboration (West & West, 2009). West
& West (2009) suggest icebreakers for this purpose, however, the group
members will be sharing personal information as part of their project so no
additional icebreaker will be used in this course.
Wiki Use
Class members will be put into groups of 3-4 individuals.
Each group will create their own wiki. The purpose of the wiki is to share
their individual Strengths, and then complete a “what if…?” scenario:
You and the others in
your group work for the same organization. You have been put in the same group
to work on a big project together. The stakes are high for this project, so
your boss has promised a bonus if you can meet the timeline and stay under
budget. How will you work effectively as a team to be successful? Specifically,
how can you improve team dynamics and team collaboration? Who (if anyone) would
you add to the group (if anyone) and why?
Lesson Plan
Week
|
Method
|
Assignment
|
Week 1
|
Discussion Post
|
Take StrengthsFinder assessment and identify your
Top 5 Strengths. Report Strengths in discussion post.
|
Week 2
|
Discussion Post
|
Answer the following questions based on your Top 5 Strengths:
·
Which Strength do you most identify with?
·
Where you surprised by any of the Strengths
that appeared in your Top 5, or did not appear in your Top 5?
·
Which of your Top 5 Strengths do you want to
learn more about and why?
|
Week 3
|
Discussion post
|
Students select one of their Top 5 Strengths to
learn about how they use it in everyday life. Students create and maintain a
log for one week tracking when they noticed they were using their Strength,
and the result. Students share two examples
|
Week 4
|
Discussion post
|
Teacher assigns groups and distributes wiki pages. Students place Top
5 Strengths on wiki page. In Discussion post students respond to team
members’ Strengths. What similarities and/or differences do you find?
|
Week 5
|
Discussion post, Wiki
|
Students are given Team Grid and add their Strengths
to Team Grid, then add Team Grid to Wiki. In Discussion post students respond
to Team Grid. What gaps exist in the Four Domains (Executing, Influencing,
Strategic Thinking, Relationship Building)? What overlaps exist?
|
Week 6
|
Students are given “what if…?” scenario. Students are to work
collaboratively to answer the questions.
|
|
Week 7
|
Wiki
|
Students post “what if…?” scenario on wiki, along
with questions and answers.
|
Week 8
|
Wiki
|
Students view other group wikis and respond to at least two other
groups.
|
Evaluation
Desired outcomes are:
·
Increased understanding of personal Strengths
·
Increased awareness of how Strengths are used in
everyday life
·
Increased understanding of diversity of others’
Strengths
·
Increased understanding of how to increase team
effectiveness using StrengthsFinder Team Grid
Students are evaluated based on the following rubric:
Outcome
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Fair
|
Poor
|
Score
|
Increased understanding of personal
Strengths
|
Strengths
listed with detailed examples and reflection on all 5 Strengths
|
Strengths
listed, few examples and reflection
|
Strengths
listed but no examples or reflection
|
No
post
|
/15
|
Increased awareness of how Strengths
are used in everyday life
|
Complete log (7 days)
with detailed information about situations where Strength was used
|
Complete log (7 days)
with some details about situations where Strength was used
|
Incomplete log (less
than 7 days) with few details about situations where Strength was used
|
Incomplete log (less
than 7 days), no situations described
|
/15
|
Increased understanding of diversity
of others’ Strengths by learning about the Strengths of group members
|
Detailed
comments on all other group members’ posts with reflection and examples of
their strengths.
|
Comments
on at least one group members’ post with reflection and/or example
|
Comments
on at least one group members’ post
|
No
comments
|
/15
|
Increased understanding
of how to increase team effectiveness using StrengthsFinder Team Grid
|
Questions answered in
detail using Team Grid
|
Questions answered
using Team Grid
|
Incomplete or unclear
answers to questions or not all questions answered
|
No use of Team Grid
|
/30
|
Total Score
|
/75
|
References
Clifton, D. (2017). Discover
your CliftonStrengths. Gallup Press: New York.
West, J.A. and West, M.L. (2009). Using Wikis for Online Collaboration.
Joss
Top 5 Clifton Strengths is a very popular topic in leadership development so I can see the real-world application of your 8-week course/training!
ReplyDeleteIn your rationale, it was not made clear whether your use of wiki was for the purpose of supporting collaborative learning, knowledge construction, critical thinking, and/or contextual application. Because "what if..." was included as a key component of your wiki project, I would assume your main purpose of the use of wiki was more for critical thinking development than contextual application. Would you agree?
Kang
Yes! I used the "what if...?" scenario as a way to use the wiki for critical thinking. I initially struggled a bit because I could see this topic fitting into any of the three domains (knowledge construction, critical thinking, and contextual application) identified by West & West (2009), but I chose the "what if...?" scenario to promote the students to think critically about their team Strengths and identify their own strategies for using them effectively.
DeleteWow! I love this idea. You mentioned a Team Grid - is that something Strengthsfinder provides or does the instructor create this? I love the idea of the "what if" scenario - provides guidance but still gives them the freedom to come up with their own plan.
ReplyDeleteMy only concern would be if a student did not feel comfortable sharing their personal strengths for some reason, how could they still be included? Perhaps instead of having each group use their own strengths, they could each be assigned a strength to use for their "what if" scenario.
I really like your lesson plan and the way you laid it out for us!
Thanks, Anaka! There is an actual Team Grid that Gallup provides. If you are interested I can send you the spreadsheet! I really like your idea about letting students choose an alternative Strength if they did not feel comfortable sharing their own.
Deletealikat217,
DeleteThat would be wonderful, thank you! I am always looking for new team building activities for my team at work. :)
Anaka
I really liked you idea as well. Perhaps as part of the "what if" scenario, the groups could analyze/predict what challenges they may face (based on their collective strengths) and brainstorm possible solutions. I liked the idea of asking them who (if anyone) they should look to add to the group to make it stronger. I think a lot of teams could benefit from this type of activity. I'm even thinking of my own office - we're about to hire a new person. This sort of activity might be useful for my supervisor to get a good idea of what type of traits to look for in a potential new employee. Lots of practical applications - great job!
ReplyDeleteGallup's Top 5 strengths is awesome, so I enjoyed reading through this. I really like the rubric that you put together for this and what it emphasizes. I also like how you clearly outlined the desired outcomes. The timeline for the 8 weeks is ideal as well, taking the first few weeks to utilize a discussion board and get on the same page before starting the wiki. Great post!
ReplyDelete